
Blog by Tricia Hedinger, MS, CCC-SLP, BCS-SCF
When individuals first seek stuttering therapy, they often arrive with a simple and understandable goal: “I want to stop stuttering.” For many first-time clients, this statement reflects years of frustration, social pressure, and experiences in a world that often equates fluency with competence. However, this initial goal is rarely the full story. Part of the speech-language pathologist’s (SLP’s) ethical responsibility is to ask the right questions to help clients clarify what they truly hope will change in their lives if fluency increases. Is it greater confidence at work? More ease in social situations? Less fear of speaking up? Increased participation in school, relationships, or leadership roles?
Through thoughtful assessment and dialogue, clinicians can explore how clients believe improved fluency may positively impact their daily functioning and emotional well-being. This process opens the door to discussing multiple pathways for achieving those deeper goals—not only through fluency-focused techniques, but also through approaches that target communication participation, self-advocacy, emotional regulation, and acceptance. Ethical practice begins not with prescribing a single method, but with understanding the meaning behind the client’s goals.
At the heart of ethical stuttering therapy lies the ongoing balance between client autonomy and clinician beneficence. Autonomy supports the client’s right to make informed choices about their care, while beneficence obligates clinicians to recommend approaches that are grounded in current evidence-based practice (EBP) and likely to support long-term well-being. These principles are not opposites; when integrated thoughtfully, they can strengthen both treatment engagement and outcomes.
We must avoid placing the burden of decision-making on the patient yet remain attentive to their values and wishes. Individualized therapy is where this balance becomes most visible. Ethical, client-centered care does not mean simply following client preferences without guidance, nor does it mean rigidly applying a single preferred framework. Instead, it involves educating clients about current EBP in accessible, respectful ways and helping them understand how different approaches may align with their personal goals. When clients are informed about the range of therapeutic options available, their autonomy becomes more meaningful, and shared decision-making becomes truly collaborative.
Blended approaches are often particularly valuable in stuttering therapy. A client may seek increased fluency but be unfamiliar with strategies such as desensitization, cognitive restructuring, or stuttering modification. Introducing these approaches—while clearly explaining their purpose and evidence base—allows clients to consider tools they may not have initially imagined but that may strongly support their deeper goals of participation, confidence, and reduced speaking avoidance.
Ultimately, ethically grounded stuttering therapy is a flexible, collaborative process that centers on the individual. When SLPs thoughtfully blend client goals with evidence-based care, remain reflective in their practice, and resist relying solely on habitual or preferred approaches, they create space to honor both autonomy and beneficence in meaningful, responsive ways.
Beneficence is a fundamental ethical principle in healthcare and research, requiring professionals to act in the best interest of patients or participants to promote their well-being, prevent harm, and remove harmful conditions. It moves beyond merely avoiding harm (non-maleficence) to actively doing good through, for example, medical treatment, advocacy, or care.
Posted Feb. 17, 2026






Podcast
Sign Up
Virtual Learning
Online CEUs
Streaming Video Library